Does the V-22 Osprey deserve the name pervertiplane because it combines the worse features of the helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft?
By: Ringo Bones
If New York Times Bestseller List literary phenom E.L. James
was an avid aviation enthusiast, James would have chosen to use the V-22 Osprey
as the private plane for Christian Grey – the young billionaire business
magnate and lead character of Fifty Shades of Grey due to the “perverted”
nature of how the V-22 Osprey works aerodynamically. But does such family of aircraft
deserve such disparaging label?
Back in the beginning 1960s, where the granddad of the V-22
Osprey and related aircraft were at their development stage, one prominent
aeronautical engineer (Igor Sikorsky?) has suggested the name “pervertiplanes”
because so many of such machines – in his view – combine the worst features of
the helicopter and the fixed-wing aircraft. The necessary provision of such
structurally difficult features as tilting wings, tilting rotors, cascade vane
assemblies and the like, which may be subjected to high gas temperatures and
periodically fluctuating air loads, all at minimum structural weight, leads to
the development of very complicated mechanical devices. The complication of
these devices, in turn, leads to a high probability of mechanical failure.
Ever since Bell Helicopter and Boeing Helicopter was awarded
the developmental contract by the US DoD for the V-22 Osprey tiltrotor type
aircraft back in 1983, engineering problems of such aircraft that were uncovered back in the
1960s were tried to be “engineered out” via the use of newly mass-manufactured ultra-lightweight
ultra-strong composites 1980s era composite materials. The USMC began training
crews for the Osprey back in 2000 before its kinks were finally ironed out and
its first long-delayed rollout in 2007 as a replacement of its ageing heavy
lift helicopters that date back from the 1960s – i.e. the USMC’s fleet of
Chinooks and CH-46 Sea Knight fleet.
Back in October 2007, Time magazine ran an article
condemning the V-22 Osprey as unsafe, overpriced and completely inadequate.
Given that composite materials make up 43 percent of the Osprey’s overall
airframe – and composite materials aren’t exactly cheap – Time magazine may
have been correct about the high cost issue of the Osprey. Safely-wise, during
its testing phase from 1991 to 2000, there were four crashes that resulted in
30 fatalities. Since becoming operational in 2007, the V-22 Osprey has had 3
crashes that had resulted in 6 fatalities and several minor incidents. The
aircraft’s accident history has generated some controversy over its perceived
safety issues. Given the aircraft’s history, fictitious billionaire-sex-pervert
Christian Grey would probably, in his right mind, steer clear away from using
such “pervertiplanes” such as the V-22 Osprey as his main private plane /
corporate aircraft.
Billionaire pervert Christian Grey using the V-22 Osprey as his executive aircraft? Cool!!! Pervertiplanes rock!!!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of Time magazine's "critique" of "pervertiplanes" - remember their scathing review of the Rockwell B-1 Lancer during the Ronald Reagan Administration calling the B-1 Bomber as the "Flying Edsel"?
ReplyDeleteIs the US Republan Party - like US Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush - fond of "pervertiplanes"?
ReplyDelete